For ants and trees, multiple partners are a boon: Study

WASHINGTON - A new study has revealed trees that sequentially partner with multi-species sets of ants produce more offspring than trees that maintain a lifelong association with any single ant.

The University of Florida study has broad implications because many of the world’s ecosystems rely on cooperative partnerships between species, said Todd Palmer of UF.

“When you snorkel on a coral reef, you’re hovering over an animal - the coral - that relies heavily on the algae it cooperates with for photosynthesis, just as when you eat an apple, you’re reaping the benefits of a tree that was pollinated by an insect,” he said.

According to Palmer, many prior studies of cooperation in nature, or mutualism, have focused on the “cheater problem”: How can cooperation persist when both sides have an incentive to reap benefits without contributing to the common good?

However, Palmer and his team looked at a common African tree and its relationships with four specialized ant partners over the tree’s lifetime.

The surprising finding was that the tree in Kenya did best when occupied by all four ant species over its lifetime, even though one ant species joined forces with beetles in ways that increased tree death rates; another sterilized the tree; and a third was so scared of the other three competing ant species that it didn’t do much of anything, said Palmer.

“Looking at the costs and benefits to the tree, not just at a single moment, but in terms of number of offspring produced over a lifetime, the best possible outcome is obtained not by having what we thought was the “good mutualist,” but rather by having all four ant species at different life stages - even the so-called parasite, cheater, freeloader scumbag ants,” he said.

The key to the new findings is the timing. When a species lives a long time, its needs may change drastically as it grows from young to old, and sequential associations with several partners may help it meet those needs at different times, he said.

“A human analogy might be that what we look for in romantic partnerships when we’re younger - perhaps a daring and exciting person who likes to be bold and take risks - is not necessarily the thing that we are looking for in a romantic partner when we get older, when stability, the ability to hold down a job and provide for children becomes more important,” he said.

In the same way, a mutualistic species may require a partner that helps it survive during its vulnerable younger years, even if that partner prevents it from reproducing, Palmer said.

Over eight years, Palmer and colleagues monitored annual survival, growth, reproduction and ant occupancy of 1,750 Acacia drepanolobium trees and constructed demographic models that related the trees’ lifetime fitness to occupation by different combinations of the four ant partners. The ostensible freeloaders turned out to be more than they seemed, he said.

The ant that conspires with a wood-boring beetle that can kill trees? It turns out that before it kills them, it causes them to produce an inordinate number of seeds, Palmer said.

The study was published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. (ANI)