US may allow FBI to tap e-mails, websites
By IANSTuesday, September 28, 2010
LONDON - The US may allow its intelligence agencies such as FBI to tap text messages, e-mails and networking websites under new powers being considered by the Barack Obama administration, a media report said Tuesday.
The FBI says extremists and drug cartels are increasingly communicating online rather than using telephones, leaving US investigators struggling to keep track of them, the Daily Telegraph reported.
A new bill requesting the additional powers to investigate suspected criminals and terrorists will be presented next year. It is likely to face stiff opposition from civil liberties advocates who say the security services have historically abused extensions of power.
James Dempsey, of the pressure group Centre for Democracy and Technology, said: “They are really asking for the authority to redesign services that take advantage of the unique architecture of the internet.”
The proposals are likely to require that all encrypted messaging services, such as BlackBerry, include a facility or back door, that would allow investigators to examine communications with a warrant, the report said.
Any foreign communications providers operating in America would also have to have an office in the country able to provide intercepts.
Software developers of internet communication services such as Skype, which are heavily encrypted, would be required to redesign their products to enable interception.
Valerie Caproni, the FBI’s general counsel, said: “We’re talking about lawfully authorised intercepts.
“We’re talking about preserving our ability to execute our existing authority in order to protect the public safety and national security.”
Apart from ethical objections, experts said there were significant technical hurdles.
Creating a back door to encrypted services would provide hackers with another opening, said Steven Bellovin, professor of computer science at Columbia University.
“There are lots of really sophisticated attackers out there,” he said. “Do we really want to create a new area of attack? It may prevent some crimes but it could lead to new ones.”